If I buy maybe one game a year because no fixed income why do you then assume I'm buying expensive Blu-Ray movies instead? Nice strawman fallacy. If I don't have cheddar then I don't have cheddar. I haven't bought a movie in over a decade, not counting a few theater visits during periods I had a job/gift card. My parents buy the movies and I watch with them.Operation Awesome wrote:Buy a 2-hour movie on blu-ray for 30 bucks = 15 dollars per hour of entertainment = totally reasonableMadican wrote:No, it really isn't. Not enough for me. When I get a game for full price it needs some serious staying power.
Buy a 12-hour game for 60 dollars = 5 dollars per hour of interactive entertainment = SUCH A TOTAL RIP OFF, GEEZ
Except that's bullshit. It's people willing to buy generic, padded games that is stifling creativity and increasing meaningless, boring padding in the game industry. Because if opinions like mine were prevailing then all games would be in the thirty-hour ballpark range when they're not.Criticizing any game that's more than about 5 hours long for being "too short" is complete bullshit and the prevalence of opinions like this is what's stifling creativity and increasing meaningless boring padding in the game industry.
I'm not coming up in this thread attacking Bioshock. I requested information and you are attacking me for it, OA, because my opinion runs counter to yours on a particular aspect of preferred games.





