Movies
-
WouldYouKindly
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:10 pm
- Location: Behind You
-
WouldYouKindly
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:10 pm
- Location: Behind You
Someone on /tv/ just said that the guys who directed the Crank films should direct the Deadpool movie
this is the greatest idea ever
this is the greatest idea ever
[url=http://regashii.deviantart.com][img]http://i48.tinypic.com/nd6hdy.gif[/img][/url]
[quote="Tales"][20:54:03] George: fun fact: I have only seen my friends dads dick[/quote]
[quote="Tales"][20:54:03] George: fun fact: I have only seen my friends dads dick[/quote]
-
Tatzel
- Tatzel "Tatzel Freeman" Freeman
- Posts: 9140
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:24 pm
- Location: City of wonders
- Contact:
I watched Braveheart on thursday for, lets say the first time ever, because back then I was still too little to understand what was happening.
And then Tatzel was

Something different, I'm thinking about going to watch Prince of Persia, but Tuxedo Mask told me that it got helluva bad critics. Did anyone saw it yet?
And then Tatzel was

Something different, I'm thinking about going to watch Prince of Persia, but Tuxedo Mask told me that it got helluva bad critics. Did anyone saw it yet?
- Superior Bacon
- Most Important Member
- Posts: 16573
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: alcoholism, oregon
I'm pretty sure the critics for Alice were worse, at least at one point. But still, it was to be expected.Tatzel wrote:Something different, I'm thinking about going to watch Prince of Persia, but Tuxedo Mask told me that it got helluva bad critics. Did anyone saw it yet?
From what I gather, it's just a relatively soulless (as in generic) action movie, so if you like that stuff, go right ahead. The mainstream will probably like it and the critics will rage because it's not deep enough for them.
Last edited by Tabarnaco on Sun May 23, 2010 12:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Yeah, and waste your time and cheddar if it sucks (disregarding the free tickets thing).
Most critics know more about movies than the mainstream does, which is why they have higher expectations than most people. You might not care, Tatzel might not care either, but it's silly to ignore their knowledge of film-making and pretend they don't exist.
There's a good amount of critics who have completely biased reviews as well, but Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic give a good overall idea of how good a film should be.
In general, classics were/are highly regarded amongst critics, while the ones that got average to bad reviews are quickly forgotten.
I guess "bad" movies should be called "ordinary" or "forgettable" instead.
Most critics know more about movies than the mainstream does, which is why they have higher expectations than most people. You might not care, Tatzel might not care either, but it's silly to ignore their knowledge of film-making and pretend they don't exist.
There's a good amount of critics who have completely biased reviews as well, but Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic give a good overall idea of how good a film should be.
In general, classics were/are highly regarded amongst critics, while the ones that got average to bad reviews are quickly forgotten.
I guess "bad" movies should be called "ordinary" or "forgettable" instead.
Last edited by Tabarnaco on Sun May 23, 2010 2:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Anna-aurion
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:57 pm
- Contact:
- Superior Bacon
- Most Important Member
- Posts: 16573
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: alcoholism, oregon
Dammit, really? Really? *sigh*Tabarnaco wrote:Yeah, and waste your time and cheddar if it sucks (disregarding the free tickets thing).
Most critics know more about movies than the mainstream does, which is why they have higher expectations than most people. You might not care, Tatzel might not care either, but it's silly to ignore their knowledge of film-making and pretend they don't exist.
There's a good amount of critics who have completely biased reviews as well, but Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic give a good overall idea of how good a film should be.
In general, classics were/are highly regarded amongst critics, while the ones that got average to bad reviews are quickly forgotten.
I guess "bad" movies should be called "ordinary" or "forgettable" instead.
I just don't like it when someone says to listen to a critic or a "professional" review before they go to see a movie. If you wanna see it, see it and form YOUR OWN OPINION. Whether or not you end up liking it or not is irrelevant. You're making a gamble every time you go into a movie theater anyway.
-
Tatzel
- Tatzel "Tatzel Freeman" Freeman
- Posts: 9140
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:24 pm
- Location: City of wonders
- Contact:
Normally I would've done this Firestorm; see a TV ad for a movie where I think it's interesting and just go watch it.
I've become more cautious in the last time, mainly because the cinema here costs a SHITTON of cheddar (a good 30 euros for two tickets, popcorn and drinks), plus 5 euros tram tickets, so it's an expensive loss if the movie is stupid. I mean, sure, I know I can't base my opinion on what other people think, but I'm trying to save as much as I can. Even if I have free tickets, let's say I use them now and think I wasted them, I had to pay a lot for a movie which would've been released soon after, and had to pay up for the new one.
I've become more cautious in the last time, mainly because the cinema here costs a SHITTON of cheddar (a good 30 euros for two tickets, popcorn and drinks), plus 5 euros tram tickets, so it's an expensive loss if the movie is stupid. I mean, sure, I know I can't base my opinion on what other people think, but I'm trying to save as much as I can. Even if I have free tickets, let's say I use them now and think I wasted them, I had to pay a lot for a movie which would've been released soon after, and had to pay up for the new one.



