WHY OLD GAMES ARE TERRIBLE, AN OBSERVATION
-
Indigo_Dingo
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Heaven, also known as Sydney
-
Game Angel
- sugoi ranger
- Posts: 10321
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:02 pm
- Location: lost
- Mr. Mander
- how much is a score
- Posts: 9905
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:12 pm
- Location: Not France
-
Indigo_Dingo
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Heaven, also known as Sydney
-
Indigo_Dingo
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Heaven, also known as Sydney
Well, I have a substantial Megadrive collection (as well as the Megadrive Collection for Ps3), and a decent collection of N64 games as well as about 18 Ps1 games I downloaded off PsN.
Last edited by Indigo_Dingo on Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Superior Bacon
- Most Important Member
- Posts: 16573
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: alcoholism, oregon
-
Indigo_Dingo
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Heaven, also known as Sydney
I'd play the three of them.Crawfish wrote:I mean, are you going to play Mario 64 when you have Mario Galaxy or Mario 64DS?
I'd play both.Crawfish wrote:Are you going to play Pokemon Red when you have FireRed?
Daikatana isn't terrible because it's an old game. It's terrible because Romero was a lazy, egotistical fucker.Indigo_Dingo wrote:And yes, I do have proof, anyone heard of Daikatana?
Only by judgemental people.Mr. Mander wrote:Play some of those same games today and they'll be found sub-par.
Doesn't matter, really. Since they were out before 2000, they just plain suck.Indigo_Dingo wrote:No, I have not played any Atari, Master System or Commodore 64 games.
Last edited by Shad on Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.



