Page 185 of 252
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 6:20 pm
by Gryewolf
FMAWolf wrote:Oh God. Holy-what-I-WHY.
Thanks, I needed more reasons to find mannequins creepy.
I'm going to guess you wouldn't find House of Wax entertaining?
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:59 am
by FMAWolf
Actually I can watch that just fine. Probably because I'm sick and find myself laughing more often than being horrified.
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:27 am
by AngusMcLeod
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:39 am
by Valbrandur
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:29 am
by The Willow Witch
Drugs are bad
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:04 am
by Dr. K Sanesk
I love reading articles about stuff like this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taman_Shud_Case
I used to have a whole list somewhere; I'll see if I can find it.
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:07 am
by Syobon
Bear attack?
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:51 am
by Sammich Monster
Syobon wrote:Bear attack?
There were no footprints besides their own.
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:56 am
by Syobon
There were no human footprints, they might not have been looking for bear footprints. Also, the bear might have only attacked the camp and didn't follow them, the ground around the camp would be too mulled over to make out bear footprints.
Valbrandur wrote:Not to mention the soft tissue wasn't damaged, which the bear would've undoubtedly harmed.
That is a better point. However, the bear might not have caused any injuries, a fall could have caused that bone damage.
Why did you delete your post?
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:57 am
by Madican
I could swear there was a Cracked article that offered a logical theory.
EDIT: Yup.
http://www.cracked.com/article_16671_6- ... tions.html
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:45 am
by Dr. K Sanesk
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:47 am
by D-vid
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:25 am
by Valbrandur
Syobon wrote:There were no human footprints, they might not have been looking for bear footprints. Also, the bear might have only attacked the camp and didn't follow them, the ground around the camp would be too mulled over to make out bear footprints.
Valbrandur wrote:Not to mention the soft tissue wasn't damaged, which the bear would've undoubtedly harmed.
That is a better point. However, the bear might not have caused any injuries, a fall could have caused that bone damage.
Why did you delete your post?
I got confused by the second article so I deleted it until I'd have read it and then if that wasn't the case, I'd post it again.
Then I just got lazy and eventually forgot
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:29 am
by scebboaliwiw
I think there was a list of creepy Wikipedia articles somewhere but I don't know where it is.
http://phocks.org/stumble/creepy/ Ok that was easier than I thought.
Re: Creepy thread
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 10:31 am
by Nachalnik
fuck these guys seriously
i hate kelpies