AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Bacon wrote:

BANANA wrote:Well what would you prefer? That, or them being killed on the spot for their disabilites? They can't exactly blend in with normal society either. It'd be better if they stay with others like them.

Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?

Anywhere outside of America, for starters.

BANANA wrote:

Bacon wrote:

BANANA wrote:Well what would you prefer? That, or them being killed on the spot for their disabilites? They can't exactly blend in with normal society either. It'd be better if they stay with others like them.

Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?

Anywhere outside of America, for starters.

Well, I didn't think of that, so--I can't really comment on that.

But still. It's like seperating people based on race or sexuality or, well, anything just because someone could be killed.

Ame no Akai wrote:

BANANA wrote:

Bacon wrote: Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?

Anywhere outside of America, for starters.

What? Are you kidding me?

I hope to God you have some kind of source for this, because this is truly ridiculous. What, Europe just ceased to exist? Asia? Ring any bells?

You seriously think America's the only place where the mentally disabled have a shot at life?

Everyone has a shot at life. And I'm sorry, that did sound stupid. I meant besides America, most of Europe and parts of Asia babies with mental or physical deformities are killed. Hell, in China some people still practice the thing where the female baby is killed or thrown out of the household when it's born for not being a male, simply because the male is regarded as superior. Most chinese nowadays don't take it that far anymore, but...

Babies with mental disabilities?! How the heck are they meant to test for that on birth? I mean, abandoning children from some big physical thing is one thing (that is still very rare anywhere), but there's nowhere that makes a point to kill people for being mentally disabled! I mean, unless it's something really serious, like being completely devoid of function or such.

Sounds like you've been spending too much time in Hollywood to me!

I live in Hollywood, so yes. This is why I don't often post in this thread.

I almost got beaten to death once when I was about 7.
This big, drooling guy who could hardly keep his eyes open and always had a weird smile on his face picked me up (he was very strong, and I only weighed about 25-30kg at the time) and threw me against a tree. He then yelled something nonsensical and he started crying. He picked up a stick and after what felt like an eternity he then he left me bleeding and broken at that tree, my body too damaged to actually move. A day or so later a policeman found me and I was in hospital for about 6 months.

tl;dr A retard almost killed me.

[I have always liked cops ever since, and hold them in the highest regard.]

Holy shit, that's awful.

They have what we call "retard strength."


We should kill all of them.

Took the words right out of my mouth

I wonder where you live Foo, in the 'pics or gtfo' thread you post you lost an eye, and now I have to read that you were nearly beaten to death by 7?
That sounds like a dangerous area you live in

I move around a lot because of loan sharks

well, according to survival of the fittest, retards are not as fit, so they will be eliminated.

however, this is civilization. most special needs people are not violent, but they will still be shunned by society. most will never be able to fit in. they can also by annoying and violent. so what should we do? seclude them? try telling a mother that her child is a menace to society and needs to be isolated, or even killed. why even have them live if they'll be shunned?

i think, logically, the best thing to do is to have them eliminated. but i'm morally against it :/

They would kill any retards in ancient Greece, not just Sparta.

The way I see it, it should just be separation for the safety of both (and the sanity of the non-disabled).

Ame no Akai wrote:

Deiphobus wrote:well, according to survival of the fittest, retards are not as fit, so they will be eliminated.

It's a mental defect, not a genetic trait. That concept doesn't apply.

Wait, isn't Down syndrome caused by having one chromosome too much?
I mean, that would be genetic after all.