Anywhere outside of America, for starters.Bacon wrote:Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?BANANA wrote:Well what would you prefer? That, or them being killed on the spot for their disabilites? They can't exactly blend in with normal society either. It'd be better if they stay with others like them.
Taboo Topics (Heavily moderated)
- Superior Bacon
- Most Important Member
- Posts: 16573
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: alcoholism, oregon
Well, I didn't think of that, so--I can't really comment on that.BANANA wrote:Anywhere outside of America, for starters.Bacon wrote:Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?BANANA wrote:Well what would you prefer? That, or them being killed on the spot for their disabilites? They can't exactly blend in with normal society either. It'd be better if they stay with others like them.
But still. It's like seperating people based on race or sexuality or, well, anything just because someone could be killed.
[5:06:23 PM] Yeili: this is kind of cool, i've beaten a murderer in mario party.

Everyone has a shot at life. And I'm sorry, that did sound stupid. I meant besides America, most of Europe and parts of Asia babies with mental or physical deformities are killed. Hell, in China some people still practice the thing where the female baby is killed or thrown out of the household when it's born for not being a male, simply because the male is regarded as superior. Most chinese nowadays don't take it that far anymore, but...Ame no Akai wrote:What? Are you kidding me?BANANA wrote:Anywhere outside of America, for starters.Bacon wrote: Wait wait wait. Since when did getting killed for having disabilities happen on a regular basis?
I hope to God you have some kind of source for this, because this is truly ridiculous. What, Europe just ceased to exist? Asia? Ring any bells?
You seriously think America's the only place where the mentally disabled have a shot at life?
Babies with mental disabilities?! How the heck are they meant to test for that on birth? I mean, abandoning children from some big physical thing is one thing (that is still very rare anywhere), but there's nowhere that makes a point to kill people for being mentally disabled! I mean, unless it's something really serious, like being completely devoid of function or such.
Sounds like you've been spending too much time in Hollywood to me!
Sounds like you've been spending too much time in Hollywood to me!
I almost got beaten to death once when I was about 7.
This big, drooling guy who could hardly keep his eyes open and always had a weird smile on his face picked me up (he was very strong, and I only weighed about 25-30kg at the time) and threw me against a tree. He then yelled something nonsensical and he started crying. He picked up a stick and after what felt like an eternity he then he left me bleeding and broken at that tree, my body too damaged to actually move. A day or so later a policeman found me and I was in hospital for about 6 months.
tl;dr A retard almost killed me.
[I have always liked cops ever since, and hold them in the highest regard.]
This big, drooling guy who could hardly keep his eyes open and always had a weird smile on his face picked me up (he was very strong, and I only weighed about 25-30kg at the time) and threw me against a tree. He then yelled something nonsensical and he started crying. He picked up a stick and after what felt like an eternity he then he left me bleeding and broken at that tree, my body too damaged to actually move. A day or so later a policeman found me and I was in hospital for about 6 months.
tl;dr A retard almost killed me.
[I have always liked cops ever since, and hold them in the highest regard.]
Last edited by Fooflyer on Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Superior Bacon
- Most Important Member
- Posts: 16573
- Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: alcoholism, oregon
well, according to survival of the fittest, retards are not as fit, so they will be eliminated.
however, this is civilization. most special needs people are not violent, but they will still be shunned by society. most will never be able to fit in. they can also by annoying and violent. so what should we do? seclude them? try telling a mother that her child is a menace to society and needs to be isolated, or even killed. why even have them live if they'll be shunned?
i think, logically, the best thing to do is to have them eliminated. but i'm morally against it :/
however, this is civilization. most special needs people are not violent, but they will still be shunned by society. most will never be able to fit in. they can also by annoying and violent. so what should we do? seclude them? try telling a mother that her child is a menace to society and needs to be isolated, or even killed. why even have them live if they'll be shunned?
i think, logically, the best thing to do is to have them eliminated. but i'm morally against it :/
- Unbalanced
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:54 am
Wait, isn't Down syndrome caused by having one chromosome too much?Ame no Akai wrote:It's a mental defect, not a genetic trait. That concept doesn't apply.Deiphobus wrote:well, according to survival of the fittest, retards are not as fit, so they will be eliminated.
I mean, that would be genetic after all.
[img]http://i40.tinypic.com/2yy2exk.jpg[/img]
[size=0]Still waiting for Vladimir Sack to become important.[/size]
[size=0]Still waiting for Vladimir Sack to become important.[/size]
