AWKWARD ZOMBIE

No Bacon, ahaha It's hard to show your tone of your message through the internets, so it's my bad.

I'm not sure what it is about men. I can't quite put my finger on it.

Defenestrator2.0 wrote:Not that I am condoning child molestation, of course. While I believe it to be a reprehensible crime (though I do realize such a position is easy to take), I do think that they are capable of redemption, as long as they are truly repentant and sincere in their intentions.

I don't think a person is capable of repenting or being truly sorry for such an act. Sure they'll be sorry that they were caught. But repentant for having done such an action? To be capable of such an action, you have already discarded the part of your mind that is capable of repenting.

Like I said... The mentality of a rapist is something like this...

Karilyn wrote:I consider it on a level comparable to something like a sadist serial killer who would tie up a person, and dismember them piece by piece while the victim screams in pain, and the killer is smiling and enjoying it the whole time.

The level of sadism that a person must possess in their heart to rape someone; hold them down and violate them, while they scream and beg to be left alone... And that gives the rapist pleasure... not only makes them pop flyin', but arouses them?

It's one thing to make jokes about Pedobear and the like. Yeah, sure, that's funny. But talking about real life here. The mentality a rapist possesses is truly horrifying. A rapist is taking pleasure in inflicting pain on someone else. For them, it is a turn-on listening to the victim scream and beg to be left alone. The crying, the pain, it arouses the rapist.

I don't think that after you have reached a point that you have the mentality that you can feel those sort of feelings, that you are capable of redemption.

Holy fuck Def I am so horny right now because of you I love you man.
By the way, about the death penalty stuff, I read kind of everything, and except Merlin, scebboaliwiw and Ange Gamer, almost all of you said crap at least once -I said almost.

For the STDs stuff...
The safest way is with a condom : you don't risk anything.
Someone said at some time that gay people were more dangerous than not gay people; could you have my punch to your throat ? \o/
You know, anal sex exists TOO for heterosexual intercourse, huh. AND STDs are transmitted through any kind of sex...
Pills are a very effective way not to be pregnant, but you'll have STDs if you have sex with someone who has one. So get tested first, it's safer. But there's no danger whatsoever to have a kid, as long as you don't forget to take the pill. And there are a few unnice things, like sometimes women can get a little fatter or some shit like that; but it's not that horrid.
There's also the pill for men, but it's not commercialised, and men wouldn't be able to think about it, so meh.
There are also quite effective other ways -like not having sex at all-, but they're less effective than condoms.
What's wrong with condoms ? It takes over 40-60% of the sexual pleasure, which remains rather interesting when you have sex. Meh.
Oh, and some condoms are done just for anal intercourse, and... and that'd be safer for analists (what, it's not that word ?) to use it.

EDIT : Karilyn, you remain quite certain on the opinion you have about the mind of a child-rapist... how the FUCK could you be so sure if you weren't one ?... You're one, or you don't know; that's just fucking ALL. I hope you're not one ? So shhhhhhhh
EDIT2 : Bacon, exactly
Oh, and page get, I just anal-raped that page.

what

I pieced together what he said and understood it all. Not his fault he's not originally an English speaker.

... shit, am I that tired that I'm not able to make myself understandabeuleul ?...
Fuck, I'm sorry...
... could anyone tell me what's wrong with what I said, so I... kinda, er, like to change it in a more... clear way ?...
... sorry...

John Craft wrote:You know, anal sex exists TOO for heterosexual intercourse, huh. AND STDs are transmitted through any kind of sex...

1. AIDs entered the human pool when there was this sick-fuck guy who happened to be gay fucked a chimpanzee. Chimpanzees are carriers of AIDs.
2. He then went around, fucked a bunch of guys, and then the gay community was infected by AIDs.
3. Eventually some bisexual guys had some sex with some women and they got AIDs too.
4. Then those women had sex with straight men, so straight men got AIDs too.

However, men statistically have sex more often than women, and the AIDs epidemic started among gays, and thus the gay community has the largest infestation rate.

Karilyn wrote:

John Craft wrote:You know, anal sex exists TOO for heterosexual intercourse, huh. AND STDs are transmitted through any kind of sex...

1. AIDs entered the human pool when there was this sick fuck guy who happened to be gay who fucked a chimpanzee. Chimpanzees are carriers of AIDs.

I thought it happened because of a cross-species blood transfusion that went wrong.

They were trying to see if they could use other primates as blood donors.

Karilyn wrote:

John Craft wrote:You know, anal sex exists TOO for heterosexual intercourse, huh. AND STDs are transmitted through any kind of sex...

1. AIDs entered the human pool when there was this sick-fuck guy who happened to be gay fucked a chimpanzee. Chimpanzees are carriers of AIDs.
2. He then went around, fucked a bunch of guys, and then the gay community was infected by AIDs.
3. Eventually some bisexual guys had some sex with some women and they got AIDs too.
4. Then those women had sex with straight men, so straight men got AIDs too.

However, men statistically have sex more often than women, and the AIDs epidemic started among gays, and thus the gay community has the largest infestation rate.

Source or it didn't happen.
WTF why the hell would it be a GAY GUY who would necessarily have sex with a freakin' monkey ?! Isn't that obvious that some moron made that up JUST TO PISS GAY PEOPLE OFF ?
I'm not gay, by the way. For real. I just hate homophobia. I find it... urg, stupid.

EDIT : seriously those were bullshit what you just said.
EDIT 2 : No, really. And where the hell did you find a statistic saying "men have more sex than women" ?!

John Craft wrote:... shit, am I that tired that I'm not able to make myself understandabeuleul ?...
Fuck, I'm sorry...
... could anyone tell me what's wrong with what I said, so I... kinda, er, like to change it in a more... clear way ?...
... sorry...

The whole no sex is less effective than condoms bit threw me off a tad, I'll admit... =_O

But I think I'm siding with DND on that last one.

DoNotDelete wrote:

Karilyn wrote:1. AIDs entered the human pool when there was this sick fuck guy who happened to be gay who fucked a chimpanzee. Chimpanzees are carriers of AIDs.

I thought it happened because of a cross-species blood transfusion that went wrong.

I thought the exact time and place of AIDs infesting the human population wasn't know. All that we know was that chimpanzees are the original carriers of it, and that it entered the human population initially in the gay community.

I figured the most logical conclusion was a person who was a zoophile.

Xeraphem wrote:The whole no sex is less effective than condoms bit threw me off a tad, I'll admit... =_O

Ahahahahahaha crap that is not because I don't usually speak English, it's just because I'm a moron and that I kinda mixed up what I meant. Sorry about that.
I leave it there 'cause I find it funny.

what the hell

I just remembered you said you were french so I made deductions.

lolololol

Ame no Akai wrote:Dude, say so next time.

I hypothesize that AIDs initially infected humanity via hot kinky chimpanzee intercourse, that involved much humping and bumping, and the exchange of seminal fluids.

Is that more acceptable?