YOUR AVATAROdds wrote:Plasma wrote:I have a girlfriend now.
....!!
WAS FUCKING PERFECT
I second that notion. :awesome:The Idiotic Oracle wrote:most fitting avatarDoNotDelete wrote:She does that on purpose...The Idiotic Oracle wrote: YOUR AVATAR
WAS FUCKING PERFECT
...but yeah, it was more fitting than ever for THAT post.
ever
I think you mixed up the quotes in there. I meant to use your opinion as a "ditto".DoNotDelete wrote:I was saying I understood the author wasn't hating on all upstanding members of society, just the whiny ones.Sounnikoura wrote:DoNotDelete wrote:Well if you actually read the comic, the author isn't saying he hates upstanding members of society, he's hating the whiny self-centred whiny ones who think they're spearheading the fight for the downtrodden upstanding members of society of the world or something.Is this what caused your hatred for public opinion? One opinion?Badfish wrote:new found hatred of the artist
I understood that. But the author is specifically referring to upstanding members of society in this comic. I'm pretty sure this same argument could be applies to other social groups too, but in this case it isn't.DoNotDelete wrote:What's your deal - do you even understand what the comic is saying yourself? The author is saying he doesn't mind whatever upstanding members of society get up to - he's accepting of all kinds of different social groups. It's just the whiny ones who think that everyone else hates them that gets up his nose.
I am. It is.DoNotDelete wrote:You're the one who seems to be trying to say this comic is an all-encompassing upstanding member of society hatred comic
Refeer to:DoNotDelete wrote:So, cowardice to the factor of two then?Sounnikoura wrote:This was once written by an unknown person, and then illustrated by Anonymous. Hence no artist.DoNotDelete wrote:Generally hate comics always make the author look the booty that they are, hence why no name on there... so he's also a coward I guess.
-------------------------------------------------------------------Bacon wrote:not slapping your name on it does not a cowardice
Right now, as I am answering, I have 7 tabs opened, with the image, the reactions to your post, your post, other sources of upstanding member of society discussing, what I am going to write in the next paragraph, etc. I have researched about, and obviously enough, read this comic, many many times.DoNotDelete wrote:You're just showing yourself up to be a upstanding member of society hater at heart, and a retarded one at that because you haven't even read and understood the image you used to make an argument.
Excuse me, but that is not on-topic at all. You are annoyed (not confused) by me (not those people), right now. Don't try to slap an "on-topic" sticker to another flame.DoNotDelete wrote:So, anyway... on-topic:
I'm confused by people who use images to try to make a point when the images are contradictory to what they are saying.
please read thisPlasma wrote:Umm... sorry, wut? That... wut? There's no instance of Ad Hominem in either the image or what he said.
I'm confuzzled.
I think you missed thisPlasma wrote:I find something very amusing in this. In that up until this point, the only person to have been directly flaming someone instead of making genuine points was... you. In the same post as when you said it was a flamewar.Sounnikoura wrote:DERP FLAMEWAR
Badfish wrote:
I did. Actually, that's the first thing I went to when I thought of questioning it. Either you and I managed to find two very different meanings of the phrase, or you're gonna need to point out specfically how it was an Ad Hominem.Sounnikoura wrote:please read thisPlasma wrote:Umm... sorry, wut? That... wut? There's no instance of Ad Hominem in either the image or what he said.
I'm confuzzled.
We have a rule here. Any Image Macro of Picard is never accepted as a valid proof of an insult.Sounnikoura wrote:I think you missed thisBadfish wrote:PICARD!