All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

How do I made forum
User avatar
Sloth
Riku's favorite/American Hero
Posts: 11187
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:36 am
Location: Space
Contact:

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Sloth »

House overheating.
3DS Friend Code : 3024-5725-9941

User avatar
Fooflyer
Posts: 13334
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 11:53 am
Location: australia

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Fooflyer »

WOW
UNREAL
MY GOSH
THIS IS AMAZING
I FEEL INCREDIBLEEEEEEE
YES YES YES YES
I CAN WIN
I FEEL GREAT
I CAN DO THIS ugh


YES
I'M HOME
I'M ALIVE
THIS IS ALL A MIRACLE
I'M AWAKE
I'M WIDE AWAKE

WOOOSH

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Firestorm
Posts: 5421
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 3:38 am

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Firestorm »

dammit piccolo

Sleauxbreaux
Posts: 1677
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 2:24 am
Location: The Breaux-Zone Layer

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Sleauxbreaux »

There was so much more dedication to that than I'd ever be willing to put into a post.
Image
Konan wrote:It was lovely meeting you all, but now I must straight-up kill your assistant.

User avatar
Shad
being a gentleman is my jojob
Posts: 15300
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:43 am

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Shad »

Fooflyer is the best
Image

Deiphobus
Posts: 6758
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:42 am

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Deiphobus »

fooflyer is gay

User avatar
Syobon
+4 to defense
Posts: 15027
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Syobon »

Passed 4 out of my 7 courses this semester. I'm okay with this, I guess.
Snarf wrote:This may sound like a very stupid question, but bear with Snarf here.
I am supposed to take a technical paragraph about something around 150-200 words and rewrite it in
laymen's terms. I'm not sure if this is a complete paragraph for some reason it makes me think it isn't.

Supermassive black holes have properties which distinguish them from lower-mass classifications:

:!: The average density of a supermassive black hole (defined as the mass of the black hole divided by the volume within its Schwarzschild radius) can be much less than the density of water (the densities are similar for 108 solar mass black holes[5]). This is because the Schwarzschild radius is directly proportional to mass, while density is inversely proportional to the volume. Since the volume of a spherical object (such as the event horizon of a non-rotating black hole) is directly proportional to the cube of the radius, average density decreases for larger black holes, being inversely proportional to the square of the mass.
:!: The tidal forces in the vicinity of the event horizon are significantly weaker. Since the central singularity is so far away from the horizon, a hypothetical astronaut traveling towards the black hole center would not experience significant tidal force until very deep into the black hole.
:!: = Bullet
0.o. Can the rewritten text at least be longer than the original? Because a lot of the terms used need a paragraph of their own to explain what they are to a layman I think.

User avatar
Madican
No face
Posts: 13531
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:18 am

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Madican »

Can I take a crack at it? My fatigue-addled mind says this can't go wrong.
Supermassive blackholes are like the fatties chugging around in those electric carts at Walmart. There's other fat people who can walk without them, but these are beyond that level of fat, like if fat just ate nothing but Twinkies, and that fat ate nothing but lard. They're also thick and take up a ton of space, but not as much as stuff like water. Yeah, fatty water. Lazing about not doing anything. Try going for a walk you fatass. And supermassive blackholes have something called the event horizon, which is like the lips of a fat person and you are cake. There won't be much suction as you enter, but you can't leave, and the closer you get to the gullet the faster you're going to get pulled in until you get crushed into nothingness in its bottomless stomach.
Stuff goes here later.

User avatar
DoNotDelete
Posts: 12220
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:12 pm
Location: Thinking.

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by DoNotDelete »

YouTube videos haven't been playing for me the past few days - unless I've been signed in.

I generally just get a black screen where the video is supposed to be (not even a loading dial).

User avatar
Syobon
+4 to defense
Posts: 15027
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Syobon »

Madican, I think I love you now.

User avatar
Sollix
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posts: 6173
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:58 pm
Location: Azeroth

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Sollix »

Syobon wrote:Madican, I think I love you now.
B-But Syobon.... I thought what we had was special...
Image

User avatar
DoNotDelete
Posts: 12220
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:12 pm
Location: Thinking.

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by DoNotDelete »

He farts for you too, Crispy.

Farts that whisper "I love you."

User avatar
Syobon
+4 to defense
Posts: 15027
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Syobon »

lol no

User avatar
Sollix
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Posts: 6173
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 2:58 pm
Location: Azeroth

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by Sollix »

DoNotDelete wrote:He farts for you too, Crispy.

Farts that whisper "I love you."
8C..........
Image

User avatar
DoNotDelete
Posts: 12220
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:12 pm
Location: Thinking.

Re: All topics unimportant enough to not create a thread for

Post by DoNotDelete »

Actually I didn't realise that wordfilters came into play when quoting somebody.

Post Reply