Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:34 am
MOST. EXCELLEEEEEENT.
MOST. EXCELLEEEEEENT.
Page 511 of 764
MOST. EXCELLEEEEEENT.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:46 am
no
no no no
NO NO NO
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
no no no
NO NO NO
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:50 am
lolwut?
what?
What?
WHAT!?
SERIOUSLY?!
what?
What?
WHAT!?
SERIOUSLY?!
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:50 am
BILL AND TED.
AGAIN.
AGAIN.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:57 am
Yeah I know!
EXCELLENT!
(Weedly woo!)
EXCELLENT!
(Weedly woo!)
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 2:59 am
My only regret... is George Carlin not being around to rock one last excellent time.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:50 am
That poster is fake.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:04 am
And you know this how...?Xabyrn wrote:That poster is fake.
And for the record they are doing a sequel even if this poster is proven fake.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:19 am
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:27 am
I know they're doing a sequel, but they've written a draft of a script and that's it.
The poster isn't on the movie's IMDB, the poster has no link to a website on it (EVERY teaser poster these days has a website on it), and it's just generally a bad fake.
The poster isn't on the movie's IMDB, the poster has no link to a website on it (EVERY teaser poster these days has a website on it), and it's just generally a bad fake.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:52 am
*Shrug* Fair enough, I see your point.Xabyrn wrote:I know they're doing a sequel, but they've written a draft of a script and that's it.
The poster isn't on the movie's IMDB, the poster has no link to a website on it (EVERY teaser poster these days has a website on it), and it's just generally a bad fake.
Doesn't mean I'm not excited about it still. Also, I think the poster looks kinda cool.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:06 am
Just got back from Lion King in 3D.
It was definitely worth seeing. But why?
For the 3D? Nope, especially not for the price($10!!!!!!), and the fact that it actually made a couple scenes uncomfortable to watch(like when it rains, for example).
For the enhanced animation quality? Yes.
For the enhanced music and sound quality? Oh yes.
For the nostalgia? OH HECK YES.
It was definitely worth seeing. But why?
For the 3D? Nope, especially not for the price($10!!!!!!), and the fact that it actually made a couple scenes uncomfortable to watch(like when it rains, for example).
For the enhanced animation quality? Yes.
For the enhanced music and sound quality? Oh yes.
For the nostalgia? OH HECK YES.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 1:49 pm
It was my favorite movie as a kid.
Also, one girl I was with apparently almost recited the whole movie from memory, which really rustled off the lady in front of her.
Also, one girl I was with apparently almost recited the whole movie from memory, which really rustled off the lady in front of her.
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:56 pm
I don't think I've seen lion king all the wat through
Re: Movies
Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 6:33 pm
Oh my god, you too! I was trying so hard no to cry during that part in the theater.Ame no Akai wrote:The Circle of Life has never failed to bring me to the verge of tears.Marcato wrote:For the nostalgia? OH HECK YES.
I'm so glad they left the morning report song out of the theater showing.