AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Ohkey, whatever, I'm bailing.



Call me childish if you want. I'm done.

Valbrandur wrote:Oh right, sorry then Syo.

No need to apologise man .

PM time then I guess.

Syobon wrote:

Valbrandur wrote:Oh right, sorry then Syo.

No need to apologise man .

But it feels good, man

hahaha

i like how dnd kept an argument about me going for over a page and i didn't post once

That doesn't even make sense Paco, it requires more then one guy to have an argument.

Well I guess at that point it was more of an argument about whether he was justified in flaming me. Or whether he was being childish. I'm not sure. Still looks like arguing to me.

Maybe we should get back on topic though.

Syobon wrote:That doesn't even make sense Paco, it requires more then one guy to have an argument.

If you're going to complain about meaningless gramatical semantics, make sure to use "than" instead of "then", eh?

I wasn't arguing his grammar, I was arguing the logic. He claims DND kept an argument going by himself, I argued that DND was not the only participant in said argument, so not the only one that kept the argument going.

You people are making me despair.

Well you sure showed me, that isn't meaningless or semantic at all

I don't understand how people can get then and than mixed up

I know right, it's like your and you're

I see people who can differentiate those two/four just fine and still use who's instead of whose.