Page 879 of 2269

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:26 am
by BurntToShreds
Some info about why rising is more actiony:
The original dev team just couldn't get all the concepts down pat. Kojima was gonna cancel the game, but Platinum came over and asked if they could give it a shot. I'm glad that it wasn't cancelled.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:30 am
by Shad
BurntToShreds wrote:Making me pay for a license to play what's already included on the product that I bought is underhanded. It's legal, yeah, but you're not going to get any repeat customers if you do it.
You're naive, the great majority of customers isn't even aware of this, and the great majority of customers who are aware do not care.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:39 pm
by BurntToShreds
Just because people don't care doesn't mean that it's a good business practice.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:45 pm
by Shad
But who are we to say that it's good or bad?

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:05 pm
by Turbro
Uhh, customers? Everyone can say if it's good or bad, since it directly impacts us. Our level of control, however, is limited to quiet protest which won't really do much in the long run.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:08 pm
by Shad
TurboPunz wrote:Uhh, customers? Everyone can say if it's good or bad, since it directly impacts us. Our level of control, however, is limited to quiet protest which won't really do much in the long run.
But not all customers think that is good, nor do they all think it's bad.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:17 pm
by Gryewolf
If you buy said game new it usually gives you a free online pass anyhow.
It doesn't bother me that much either way, though. most of the time I wont even bother with the mutiplayer, and if you wanted to try it out regardless, most to do you a free trial to see if you like it.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:08 pm
by Syobon
BurntToShreds wrote:Just because people don't care doesn't mean that it's a good business practice.
A good business practice is one that makes the company a lot of cheddar. Guess what DLC does?

I hope I don't have to tell you that "it doesn't feel right" is a pretty poor argument. It's mostly just a reaction to something new and maybe a bit scary like Ame said.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:46 pm
by Valbrandur
Have to say though, saves the trouble of spending download bandwidth to get it.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:57 pm
by Madican
That's a different thing from DLC you're talking about. That's taking a chunk of the main game away from people who didn't get it new, which is definitely evil. There is no other business that would even think of doing that for used sales. Books don't suddenly miss a critical chapter if you buy them second-hand, cars aren't missing the A/C if you get it used (unless it was already like that), and every other used item is intended to be fully functional with everything intact.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:06 pm
by Shad
Madican wrote:That's a different thing from DLC you're talking about. That's taking a chunk of the main game away from people who didn't get it new, which is definitely evil.
Hah, are you serious? It's "evil"? Wow, I'm sure you'll win all the cases in court with that argument.
It's business. Companies want to make cheddar and that's normal. They can perfectly say that "online multiplayer was given to people that bought the game new as a reward" to counter the argument that it was part of the game that got locked away for future buyers.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:15 pm
by Madican
Except they have no right to do that. And no, that wouldn't fly in a court, if it came to that. Don't know how court works in France, but here in the US existing precedence is the key to civil cases. And when has online has been a standard feature in all games previous, trying to word it so it comes off as a "reward" for buying new would fall flat on its face.

Companies can say whatever the hell they want. When it comes to civil court though the only thing that actually matters is how the legal system has interpreted such things in the past or the norm for such things if it's new.

And yeah. Evil. When a company does something with malevolent intent for the sole purpose of draining every last dollar out of customer's pockets, that is evil. Just because you say capitalism doesn't automatically make a company into a paragon of pure light and good.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:40 pm
by Flicky
Humble Indie Bundle 4 already?

Wow.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:40 pm
by Shad
Madican wrote:Except they have no right to do that. And no, that wouldn't fly in a court, if it came to that. Don't know how court works in France, but here in the US existing precedence is the key to civil cases. And when has online has been a standard feature in all games previous, trying to word it so it comes off as a "reward" for buying new would fall flat on its face.
First of all, no, online hasn't been a standard feature in all games previous. Ever heard of World of Warcraft or all the other games that you have to pay to play online?...
Besides, to play online with games such as Mortal Kombat 9, you do need to have a multiplayer code. You get one if you buy the game new but have to buy one if you get the game used. It's called 1st purchaser reward program and it simply means that online play is not part of the full game but something extra. And as I said before, it's not the first time a video game company makes you pay to play online. So, no, it wouldn't fall flat on its face. The do have the right to make you pay to play online.
Madican wrote:And yeah. Evil. When a company does something with malevolent intent for the sole purpose of draining every last dollar out of customer's pockets, that is evil. Just because you say capitalism doesn't automatically make a company into a paragon of pure light and good.
I'd be glad if you stopped stuffing words in my mouth. Did I say these companies were paragons of pure light and good? No. So quit it.
That said, these companies owe you nothing and doing stuff like that does NOT make them "evil". Evil is simply a word people stick to things they don't like to justify their hatred of it. How is wanting cheddar for the company to be succesful and do more games "evil"? "Just because you say they are evil doesn't make it so". They are companies and they are out there to do cheddar. If you think otherwise, you're kidding yourself.
Another thing: buying a game and all of its DLC will not suck all the cheddar out of your wallet. Yes, video games are expensive, but not that much.

Re: General Game Gabbin'

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:57 pm
by Syobon
Well put Le Great Handsome Oppressor, let me just add

Nobody is forcing you to buy their games. There is no false advertising. They show you the product, and they decide what that product is, not you, and then you decide if you want to buy it. Don't like it? Don't buy it.

There is no good or evil, only marketing.