Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 5:46 pm
I actually have to agree with Plasma on this one.Plasma wrote:Look... just don't bring console bias into threads not specifically about consoles. It always makes you look bad and generally isn't welcome.
usually not funny
http://www.awkwardzombie.com/forum/
I actually have to agree with Plasma on this one.Plasma wrote:Look... just don't bring console bias into threads not specifically about consoles. It always makes you look bad and generally isn't welcome.
I wasn't trying to troll, that's just what I thought when I first saw the concept art.Defenestrator2.0 wrote:troll
C'mon, you even quoted people saying you shouldn't be doing this! I mean, you can argue computer power, you can argue controls, but you can't argue that a completely different publisher to these games has gone down in respect in your opinion as a reason why it's a bad move!Board wrote:I have a Wii. I love Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn, I love Smash (in moderation), and I love my old Gamecube games, but the console has proven that it can't support games like this (serious business games). They've tried. Nintendo stopped giving a rat's booty about what people think a little while ago and they're better financially for it. Whatever, I've said my piece about that.
True but that still stuck to the fantasy side of things, steampunk is pretty different, Disney has their limits and I think this probably goes beyond it.scebboaliwiw wrote:Eh, we had Kingdom Hearts...
If they let one of their writers create a story where Scrooge McDuck has sex, I think we can fit this under the radar.Zink wrote:Unfortunately, even if that concept art is real, Disney would never allow it to happen. From what I've heard, Disney is really stingy about how their characters can be used. Chances are, the final product will be much less interesting and probably suck.
To be fair, a post apocalyptic Disney game (or really, any post apocalyptic game) would need a fair amount of visual oomph, something that the Wii isn't exactly known for.Bacon wrote:I actually have to agree with Plasma on this one.Plasma wrote:Look... just don't bring console bias into threads not specifically about consoles. It always makes you look bad and generally isn't welcome.
One: source plzIndigo_Dingo wrote:If they let one of their writers create a story where Scrooge McDuck has sex, I think we can fit this under the radar.Zink wrote:Unfortunately, even if that concept art is real, Disney would never allow it to happen. From what I've heard, Disney is really stingy about how their characters can be used. Chances are, the final product will be much less interesting and probably suck.
Who are you and what have you done with Plasma.Plasma wrote:Look... just don't bring console bias into threads not specifically about consoles. It always makes you look bad and generally isn't welcome.
Well, a saloon singer named Glittering Goldy drugged Scrooge and robbed him of his Goose-egg nugget. He tracked her back down, ripped apart the saloon with his bare hands and dragged her back to his claim to teach her a lesson. Then, after a month of sexual tension including a bear, a mammoth, handfuls of beaver spit and a rescue attempt by cowboys, this happens:Bacon wrote:One: source plzIndigo_Dingo wrote:If they let one of their writers create a story where Scrooge McDuck has sex, I think we can fit this under the radar.Zink wrote:Unfortunately, even if that concept art is real, Disney would never allow it to happen. From what I've heard, Disney is really stingy about how their characters can be used. Chances are, the final product will be much less interesting and probably suck.
Two: this isn't exactly 'under the radar'

