Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:37 am
Geekologie is fun, is it not?Defenestrator2.0 wrote:
I HAVE THE POWEEEEEEEEEEEER!
Geekologie is fun, is it not?Defenestrator2.0 wrote:
I HAVE THE POWEEEEEEEEEEEER!
Actually, I saw that at Gizmodo.MORGANMAN wrote:Geekologie is fun, is it not?Defenestrator2.0 wrote:http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/g ... all_01.jpg
I HAVE THE POWEEEEEEEEEEEER!
Yeah, I just started up on it again. I stopped reading for a bit after he kept posting chicks. Namely the fat ones. :/Defenestrator2.0 wrote:Actually, I saw that at Gizmodo.MORGANMAN wrote:Geekologie is fun, is it not?Defenestrator2.0 wrote:http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/g ... all_01.jpg
I HAVE THE POWEEEEEEEEEEEER!
I love Geekologie, though. Haven't been checking it lately, though.





No, see, if it looks even remotely functional, its not art!Yewkewbius wrote:This one, however just struck me as 'overly stylish and not enough functional'
well... well....Plasma wrote:No, see, if it looks even remotely functional, its not art!Yewkewbius wrote:This one, however just struck me as 'overly stylish and not enough functional'







Wow, good stuff! Thanks for contributing!Miranda wrote:
I'm just replying to everything now.
Anyway, that's Paul Rudolph's. I love his designs.
I don't mind. Contributions are not required to be in the form of sinks. Sinks just happen to be a popular product for designers, it seems.Miranda wrote:Sorry about the lack of sink.